<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Digital Ministry US - Web News Shares</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalministry.com</link>
		<description>Digital Ministry</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<item>
			<title>Google Wave&apos;s hype has already gone</title>
			<link>http://www.zdnet.com.au/insight/software/soa/Google-Wave-s-hype-has-already-gone/0,139023769,339300226,00.htm</link>
			<guid>http://www.zdnet.com.au/insight/software/soa/Google-Wave-s-hype-has-already-gone/0,139023769,339300226,00.htm</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Has it really only been four months since Google opened Wave to the public, inspiring hundreds of thousands of people to sign up? It feels like a lot longer.

That's because it only took half that time for the monumental amount of hype around Google Wave which had steadily built over the previous six months like a snowball rolling down a massive internet slope to dissipate as early adopters realised they couldn't figure out just what Google Wave was supposed to be used for.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Digital Ministry</dc:creator>
			<dc:date>2010-01-12</dc:date>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Content Farms: Why Media, Blogs &amp; Google Should Be Worried</title>
			<link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/content_farms_impact.php?</link>
			<guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/content_farms_impact.php?</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I've been writing a lot about so-called 'content farms' in recent months - companies like Demand Media and Answers.com which create thousands of pieces of content per day and are making a big impact on the Web. Both of those two companies are now firmly inside the top 20 Web properties in the U.S., on a par with the likes of Apple and AOL. Big media, blogs and Google are all beginning to take notice.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Digital Ministry</dc:creator>
			<dc:date>2009-12-14</dc:date>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Five Technologies That Will Keep Shaping the Web in 2010</title>
			<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-development/five-technologies-that-will-keep-shaping-the-web-in-2010/</link>
			<guid>http://sixrevisions.com/web-development/five-technologies-that-will-keep-shaping-the-web-in-2010/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[As we're coming to the end of this year, everyone starts to look towards the next one and there will no doubt be an upsurge of articles predicting the web trends of 2010 in the next days to come. However, in this article, we'll be talking about what's actually driving these trends now, and what they mean for the future of the internet.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Digital Ministry</dc:creator>
			<dc:date>2009-12-13</dc:date>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>&apos;Father of the Internet&apos; Lists Flaws in Original Design</title>
			<link>http://katecarruthers.com/blog/2009/11/fora-father-of-the-internet-lists-flaws-in-original-design/</link>
			<guid>http://katecarruthers.com/blog/2009/11/fora-father-of-the-internet-lists-flaws-in-original-design/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[The very smart Vint Cerf sharing some of the things he'd change about the internet (via Fora.tv).  Fascinating stuff.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Digital Ministry</dc:creator>
			<dc:date>2009-11-20</dc:date>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Video in HTML5: Still an Unresolved Issue</title>
			<link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/video_in_html5_still_an_unresolved_issue.php</link>
			<guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/video_in_html5_still_an_unresolved_issue.php</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[It only took 3 years to go from HTML2 to HTML4, but the HTML4.01 specifications were published 10 years ago and even though today's web looks very different, we are still waiting for HTML5. The Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group started preliminary work on what is now known as HTML5 in 2004 and the W3C HTML Working Group was adopted this draft as the basis for the HTML5 specs in 2007. Some modern browsers already offer partial support for HTML5, but there are still quite a few issues that need to be resolved before we will see the finalized version of the HTML5 specifications. One area where there is still a lot of discussion is support for video in HTML5.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Digital Ministry</dc:creator>
			<dc:date>2009-11-19</dc:date>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
